60's, 70's, 80's, 90's
Tuesday, March 21, 2006
How To Bulid A Batteryman Otk Deck
The city splits
City
Past City
rican pop
vintage clothing and more
The city of artifacts from the past (bags, purses, lunch boxes, dolls, dolls, old books, magazines, lp's, cd's, lamps.)
City spacesuits. Space because of one space to another, in the City Lastly, you can travel from the 60's to 80's. We have costumes from the 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's.
Collections of clothing:
The garden vintage
Lispector's Collection
Pine Vintage
"In the LABO, Dad"
A place where we offer excuses for getting bored in this country only 7 pesos (charge for good Fortunately, we are superstitious, sorry for the inconveniences)
Workshop tale "Let the children come to me"
(for children 7 to 12 years) by the writer Antonia Russe
Nydia photography workshop (by photographer Alberto Juan)
Advertising Creativity Workshop by writer Antonia Nydia
Russe Exhibition of Art and Film
For more information write to www.estadolibre6dedos @ yahoo.com
Saturday, March 18, 2006
What To Eat To Make Your Sweet Voice
ECONOMIC CHANGE: pincer movement
ECONOMIC CHANGE: pincer movement
The election debate has found an unusual consensus: no one agrees to rely on the "trickle down", and all the candidates say that mining generates very few jobs and raise the need for a change in economic orientation. Bad news for the neo-liberal IPE: in the public debate, and left.
The question now is how to achieve this change of economic model to one in which the majority of the population, especially the poorest, may benefit. The issue is not easy, because this model has a lot of economic strength. In essence, the paradigm shift requires what is called a pincer movement, ie the simultaneous display of two movements that surround the enemy.
A movement is the redistribution of large gains, particularly those that produce our mining, oil and gas, especially now that commodity prices are soaring. Also the banks and AFPs are achieving exceptional returns. Establishing fair conditions for the exploitation of our natural resources and taxing higher earners is crucial to obtain the resources needed for education, health and quality of social protection and come to all Peruvians. This is a movement of redistribution, making the state meet to ensure social rights from a collective utilization of national wealth. Restore basic labor rights is another policy in this regard.
The other movement is to encourage employment-intensive sectors such as agriculture, industry, tourism and small businesses. Here we must emphasize in policies that expand markets, provide credit, arrange production chains, provide trade information and promote the adoption of new technologies. This is a movement of sectoral shift, turning into a growth generates employment and decentralized.
These two movements have two essential connections and therefore the need to march together. On the one hand, credit programs, business information and technical assistance for agriculture and SMEs require public financing, which can only come from the increase in tax revenue. The other connection is the sector: only taxing the mining and large capital on the one hand, and promoting the agriculture and small businesses on the other, is that the rudder will turn the force necessary to change the course of growth into an inclusive and comprehensive. NAFTA acogotar
both movements. On the side of tax collection and large mining capital, the FTA prevents the Peruvian state contracts check detrimental to national interest, as in the case of Camisea. On the other hand, the FTA will remove the agricultural market place where products, as imports of subsidized U.S. will make unfair competition (and 97% of the land is for the domestic market and only 3% export).
growth
Search inclusive employment generator without renegotiating terms with mining and distribution of large monopolies, and signing the FTA, is impossible. Nice to know when deciding vote. 
ECONOMIC CHANGE: pincer movement
The election debate has found an unusual consensus: no one agrees to rely on the "trickle down", and all the candidates say that mining generates very few jobs and raise the need for a change in economic orientation. Bad news for the neo-liberal IPE: in the public debate, and left.
The question now is how to achieve this change of economic model to one in which the majority of the population, especially the poorest, may benefit. The issue is not easy, because this model has a lot of economic strength. In essence, the paradigm shift requires what is called a pincer movement, ie the simultaneous display of two movements that surround the enemy.
A movement is the redistribution of large gains, particularly those that produce our mining, oil and gas, especially now that commodity prices are soaring. Also the banks and AFPs are achieving exceptional returns. Establishing fair conditions for the exploitation of our natural resources and taxing higher earners is crucial to obtain the resources needed for education, health and quality of social protection and come to all Peruvians. This is a movement of redistribution, making the state meet to ensure social rights from a collective utilization of national wealth. Restore basic labor rights is another policy in this regard.
The other movement is to encourage employment-intensive sectors such as agriculture, industry, tourism and small businesses. Here we must emphasize in policies that expand markets, provide credit, arrange production chains, provide trade information and promote the adoption of new technologies. This is a movement of sectoral shift, turning into a growth generates employment and decentralized.
These two movements have two essential connections and therefore the need to march together. On the one hand, credit programs, business information and technical assistance for agriculture and SMEs require public financing, which can only come from the increase in tax revenue. The other connection is the sector: only taxing the mining and large capital on the one hand, and promoting the agriculture and small businesses on the other, is that the rudder will turn the force necessary to change the course of growth into an inclusive and comprehensive. NAFTA acogotar
both movements. On the side of tax collection and large mining capital, the FTA prevents the Peruvian state contracts check detrimental to national interest, as in the case of Camisea. On the other hand, the FTA will remove the agricultural market place where products, as imports of subsidized U.S. will make unfair competition (and 97% of the land is for the domestic market and only 3% export).
growth
Search inclusive employment generator without renegotiating terms with mining and distribution of large monopolies, and signing the FTA, is impossible. Nice to know when deciding vote.
How To Get Rid Of Plastic Taste In Camelback
MEDICINES FOR EVERYONE TO KICK
MEDICINES FOR EVERYONE
One of the major public health problems is the lack of access to medicines. Only one of every four Peruvians is affiliated with EsSalud and may request free medications, which sometimes are not available. The same goes with SIS, which only covers children and pregnant women. To be really the right to health, everyone should have access to medicines of assured quality, which many poor in our country fail. Several
candidates have placed emphasis on promoting universal insurance for all people, but until this becomes a reality is a long way to go. Cheaper medicines must be a fundamental policy, because it reduces the impact on the pockets of those who have to buy and release public budget to expand health care to most Peruvians.
A first policy should be to promote competition. In the market for the product brand drugs can cost up to ten or twenty times more than similar generic. The government should facilitate that people can choose the product you choose. This requires you to monitor all prescriptions with generic name (What is known as the international nonproprietary name), so that when we go to the pharmacy can choose between different options. You must also ensure the quality of all the medicines, so there is no doubt that a generic has the same healing effects that a branded product. The government also should have a policy of information, through advertisements and the Internet where we can compare the Peruvians. Finally, the Ministry of Health should ensure that all districts and neighborhoods, some of the pharmacies are open 24 hours 7 days a week, selling generic products of assured quality at affordable prices. Tenders public to supply the distribution chain should be carefully monitored and implemented drastic sanctions officials and corrupt businesses that profit improperly from a sensitive issue such as health and life of Peruvians.
On the other hand, patent rules to protect monopolies and allow transnational corporations to set prices at will, should be properly regulated. This FTA will extend the monopoly power of large international laboratories should not be accepted. But even before NAFTA, multinationals have 20 years of patent protection in which they have a closed market just for them but may have competition. The government should, benefit from the flexibility which allows the betrayal of Doha World Trade Organization, declare that medicines for HIV / AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, cancer, heart disease, mental health and other priorities, even when they are protected by patents, may be produced or imported as generics. It would break the monopoly on these products allow healthy competition.
Much can be done to make medicines available to all Peruvians. Universal insurance financed by public budget is an important way, but to regulate the market and avoid monopoly abuse is another key measure that parties and candidates should consider in this election. 
MEDICINES FOR EVERYONE
One of the major public health problems is the lack of access to medicines. Only one of every four Peruvians is affiliated with EsSalud and may request free medications, which sometimes are not available. The same goes with SIS, which only covers children and pregnant women. To be really the right to health, everyone should have access to medicines of assured quality, which many poor in our country fail. Several
candidates have placed emphasis on promoting universal insurance for all people, but until this becomes a reality is a long way to go. Cheaper medicines must be a fundamental policy, because it reduces the impact on the pockets of those who have to buy and release public budget to expand health care to most Peruvians.
A first policy should be to promote competition. In the market for the product brand drugs can cost up to ten or twenty times more than similar generic. The government should facilitate that people can choose the product you choose. This requires you to monitor all prescriptions with generic name (What is known as the international nonproprietary name), so that when we go to the pharmacy can choose between different options. You must also ensure the quality of all the medicines, so there is no doubt that a generic has the same healing effects that a branded product. The government also should have a policy of information, through advertisements and the Internet where we can compare the Peruvians. Finally, the Ministry of Health should ensure that all districts and neighborhoods, some of the pharmacies are open 24 hours 7 days a week, selling generic products of assured quality at affordable prices. Tenders public to supply the distribution chain should be carefully monitored and implemented drastic sanctions officials and corrupt businesses that profit improperly from a sensitive issue such as health and life of Peruvians.
On the other hand, patent rules to protect monopolies and allow transnational corporations to set prices at will, should be properly regulated. This FTA will extend the monopoly power of large international laboratories should not be accepted. But even before NAFTA, multinationals have 20 years of patent protection in which they have a closed market just for them but may have competition. The government should, benefit from the flexibility which allows the betrayal of Doha World Trade Organization, declare that medicines for HIV / AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, cancer, heart disease, mental health and other priorities, even when they are protected by patents, may be produced or imported as generics. It would break the monopoly on these products allow healthy competition.
Much can be done to make medicines available to all Peruvians. Universal insurance financed by public budget is an important way, but to regulate the market and avoid monopoly abuse is another key measure that parties and candidates should consider in this election.
Safe Lubricant At Home For Masterbation For Women
TLC HEALTH POLICIES: CONSENSUS AND PROPOSALS WOULD
HEALTH POLICIES: CONSENSUS AND Pedro Francke
EMPHASIS
Six political groups - the National Unity APRA party, Frente de Centro, Nacionalista Party, Union for Peru, National Socialist Party and Justice - Government plans submitted on 23 February in an event organized by ForoSalud, the Medical College and the Universidad Cayetano Heredia, where they received feedback from experts, and an interesting debate opening debate on the subject (the presentations can be seen in www.forosalud.org.pe ). Descentralista Coalition also filed its plan of government in health that week.
The presentations showed that there are some points to which there is broad consensus as to promote involvement, concern for social and environmental determinants of health and move towards universal insurance. In fact, in the same event circulated a health policy agreement is being signed by a broad group of parties.
While consensus is important, it is also true that on many issues presented several plans of government are guilty of generality and say few concrete proposals. For example, in the field of health, the proposals presented by Lourdes Flores in the recent advertisement, were not presented as central to the event held. The parties seem to prefer, in presentations like this where there is room for dialogue, and present no clear priorities a wide range of proposals, while leaving more detailed proposals to the field of propaganda. In this area, few groups have pointed out how many additional resources devoted to the health budget and where the obtained: APRA and the Socialist Party which included highlights from both.
A controversial issue in health has long been to the breakdown of health systems, including the Ministry of Health and Healing EsSalud FuerzasArmadas and the police. Except for National Unity, almost all groups pose to move towards an integration of these systems.
other hand, the issue of universal, ie ensuring that all Peruvians access to health care without paying at the time of need, was also reported by almost all, many of them emphasizing the SIS and EsSalud as moving toward this goal. None, however, came to specify what specific measures would take the matter or to which groups or extended first priority risks insurance and how much budget.
Instead, the goal of overcoming inequality figure prominently only in the plan of National Unity, but not clearly linked to policy proposals that this group poses. Other groups such as the Socialist Party and the PNUP of Ollanta Humala, rather emphasize that health should be understood as a fundamental right.
There are only two months to the elections, and just beginning to see proposals for government health plans, which still sin of generality. Hopefully in the next few weeks may have further discussions and presentations, and the public can learn more detail of specific proposals that each political group poses. 
HEALTH POLICIES: CONSENSUS AND Pedro Francke
EMPHASIS
Six political groups - the National Unity APRA party, Frente de Centro, Nacionalista Party, Union for Peru, National Socialist Party and Justice - Government plans submitted on 23 February in an event organized by ForoSalud, the Medical College and the Universidad Cayetano Heredia, where they received feedback from experts, and an interesting debate opening debate on the subject (the presentations can be seen in www.forosalud.org.pe ). Descentralista Coalition also filed its plan of government in health that week.
The presentations showed that there are some points to which there is broad consensus as to promote involvement, concern for social and environmental determinants of health and move towards universal insurance. In fact, in the same event circulated a health policy agreement is being signed by a broad group of parties.
While consensus is important, it is also true that on many issues presented several plans of government are guilty of generality and say few concrete proposals. For example, in the field of health, the proposals presented by Lourdes Flores in the recent advertisement, were not presented as central to the event held. The parties seem to prefer, in presentations like this where there is room for dialogue, and present no clear priorities a wide range of proposals, while leaving more detailed proposals to the field of propaganda. In this area, few groups have pointed out how many additional resources devoted to the health budget and where the obtained: APRA and the Socialist Party which included highlights from both.
A controversial issue in health has long been to the breakdown of health systems, including the Ministry of Health and Healing EsSalud FuerzasArmadas and the police. Except for National Unity, almost all groups pose to move towards an integration of these systems.
other hand, the issue of universal, ie ensuring that all Peruvians access to health care without paying at the time of need, was also reported by almost all, many of them emphasizing the SIS and EsSalud as moving toward this goal. None, however, came to specify what specific measures would take the matter or to which groups or extended first priority risks insurance and how much budget.
Instead, the goal of overcoming inequality figure prominently only in the plan of National Unity, but not clearly linked to policy proposals that this group poses. Other groups such as the Socialist Party and the PNUP of Ollanta Humala, rather emphasize that health should be understood as a fundamental right.
There are only two months to the elections, and just beginning to see proposals for government health plans, which still sin of generality. Hopefully in the next few weeks may have further discussions and presentations, and the public can learn more detail of specific proposals that each political group poses.
M Jak Milosc Odcinki 807
TLC TO KICK
Alejandro Toledo's attempt to sign the Free Trade Agreement "yes or yes" just a couple of days before the election, is a complete nonsense. Clearly, if the public is being consulted democratically expressed voice of the people at the polls should be considered when making a decision as important as this.
On the other hand, even if signed by Toledo and Bush, NAFTA still needs to be approved by the U.S. Congress before entering into force. Toledo could not even get the promise that the FTA will be considered shortly in the Capitol being most likely have to wait a long time, as anticipated this week none other than the vice president of Colombia.
The "TLC yes or yes" in Toledo without basic democratic considerations, passes over the millions of Peruvians who will be negatively affected by NAFTA, and for which there is still basic programs or budgets to compensate. The government has said that millions of Peruvians affected by rising drug prices and hundreds of thousands of farmers lost their market and their income will fall, they will be compensated. But it has not yet submitted a master plan, implementation arrangements and budgets minimum Whether that is true. For its part, the candidates also are in favor of NAFTA have submitted a proposal in this regard, let alone of course those who say that yet "they are thinking (" how long?).
Toledo wants the government to approve the FTA bypassing democracy and regardless of the impoverishment of millions of Peruvians. To add insult to injury, the government secretly negotiating an FTA with Chile to deliver even more benefits and goodies to our southern neighbor. And TLC, NO. The Peruvian people must be heard and considered, and a referendum is the way to go.
2011 Mysore Mallige Blue Film
EMPHASIS: PS CONTRACTS AND CD
proposal would
As in every election time, the present is full of promises: better education, universal health insurance, water for all, public works, public safety effectively.
Hence the hardest thing the decision of whom to vote in the upcoming elections is that we must not only analyze what each one, but how it intends to achieve. Even if we believed in the good faith of the candidates, it is known that "good intentions is paved with hell." In deciding our vote not only intentions matter, but especially the proposals of how to achieve the objectives.
regard, we can divide the political spectrum in two. One of them, has no idea on how to achieve what it promises. Its aim is simply to be chosen. The promises are nothing but a part of the campaign, the slogans, the election symbol, the name of the candidate and colors that identify them.
At the other end of the spectrum, there are parties who have been worrying about how to achieve the goals they espouse. These are the ones who not only want to be elected, but above all give the country a better government. Perhaps Peruvian politics, rather than divided into right and left, is divided between the improvised and preparations.
A presentation organized last week by Rio Open with representatives of the Socialist Party and Coalition Descentralista showed that both parties are, without doubt, in the group of preparations. The presentation goes into detail on how to realize those desires for social development and poverty reduction. The first put more emphasis on the need for tax reform that affects those who have more to achieve the required resources for education, health, poverty reduction and public safety. The second, put more emphasis on the detail of the measures in some of these areas. No doubt two proposals, more complementary than conflicting, noted for his seriousness in this election.
This election, there is only empty promises and electoral circus. There are also good suggestions. Question of stopping to listen carefully, to choose well. 
proposal would
As in every election time, the present is full of promises: better education, universal health insurance, water for all, public works, public safety effectively.
Hence the hardest thing the decision of whom to vote in the upcoming elections is that we must not only analyze what each one, but how it intends to achieve. Even if we believed in the good faith of the candidates, it is known that "good intentions is paved with hell." In deciding our vote not only intentions matter, but especially the proposals of how to achieve the objectives.
regard, we can divide the political spectrum in two. One of them, has no idea on how to achieve what it promises. Its aim is simply to be chosen. The promises are nothing but a part of the campaign, the slogans, the election symbol, the name of the candidate and colors that identify them.
At the other end of the spectrum, there are parties who have been worrying about how to achieve the goals they espouse. These are the ones who not only want to be elected, but above all give the country a better government. Perhaps Peruvian politics, rather than divided into right and left, is divided between the improvised and preparations.
A presentation organized last week by Rio Open with representatives of the Socialist Party and Coalition Descentralista showed that both parties are, without doubt, in the group of preparations. The presentation goes into detail on how to realize those desires for social development and poverty reduction. The first put more emphasis on the need for tax reform that affects those who have more to achieve the required resources for education, health, poverty reduction and public safety. The second, put more emphasis on the detail of the measures in some of these areas. No doubt two proposals, more complementary than conflicting, noted for his seriousness in this election.
This election, there is only empty promises and electoral circus. There are also good suggestions. Question of stopping to listen carefully, to choose well.
A Discoloration In The Tissue Of The Cervix
avoid cavities: TEETH CLEANING AND SALT fluoridation
Prevent Cavities: TEETH CLEANING AND SALT fluoridation
One of the areas most neglected health care in our country's oral health. When you visit rural villages, draws attention to the dire state of the teeth of many of the peasants. When you talk to a woman from a Lima shantytown, is not unusual to find the concern for denture problems, which usually means a lot of pain and also a major economic effort for an extraction, as are root canals or crowns, for a poor family, too expensive. If for any middle-class us a toothache is something very unpleasant but very casual and remedied without too much difficulty for the poor of Peru, the problem of the teeth is really a pain.
However, the Peruvian government does little or nothing about it, particularly with regard to prevention. The first policy in this area is essential to teach children to brush their teeth. I have insisted on this with my daughters to make it a habit, but how can we expect the rural poor who have no usual or has been taught to brush their teeth, do so with your children? School breakfast programs should include the sharing of toothbrushes and toothpaste in poor areas, and teachers should ensure that after breakfast, all children in line to brush their teeth.
I just read that there is another simple and effective policy to prevent caries: fluoridate salt. For many years it is known that fluoride acts as protector of the teeth, and has invested in fluoridate drinking water. But of course, this only works where there is water and a company that can fluoridated, which is not If rural villages. On the other hand, a preventive health programs more successful in Peru has been to iodized salt, which has errradicado goiter. Salt, for universal consumption, is an ideal medium for enhancing micronutrients. In Jamaica, by copying the experience of Switzerland and France, fluoridated salt at a cost of 6 cents per person per year, which reduced to 80% of tooth decay in children. For every dollar spent, saved 250 for future costs of treatment. Would not be difficult to do something similar in Peru.
Oral health has long been a forgotten issue in our country with enormous economic and human suffering for many. There are policies prevention and cure and rehabilitation, which can be implemented without much difficulty. It just takes political will and decision. 
Prevent Cavities: TEETH CLEANING AND SALT fluoridation
One of the areas most neglected health care in our country's oral health. When you visit rural villages, draws attention to the dire state of the teeth of many of the peasants. When you talk to a woman from a Lima shantytown, is not unusual to find the concern for denture problems, which usually means a lot of pain and also a major economic effort for an extraction, as are root canals or crowns, for a poor family, too expensive. If for any middle-class us a toothache is something very unpleasant but very casual and remedied without too much difficulty for the poor of Peru, the problem of the teeth is really a pain.
However, the Peruvian government does little or nothing about it, particularly with regard to prevention. The first policy in this area is essential to teach children to brush their teeth. I have insisted on this with my daughters to make it a habit, but how can we expect the rural poor who have no usual or has been taught to brush their teeth, do so with your children? School breakfast programs should include the sharing of toothbrushes and toothpaste in poor areas, and teachers should ensure that after breakfast, all children in line to brush their teeth.
I just read that there is another simple and effective policy to prevent caries: fluoridate salt. For many years it is known that fluoride acts as protector of the teeth, and has invested in fluoridate drinking water. But of course, this only works where there is water and a company that can fluoridated, which is not If rural villages. On the other hand, a preventive health programs more successful in Peru has been to iodized salt, which has errradicado goiter. Salt, for universal consumption, is an ideal medium for enhancing micronutrients. In Jamaica, by copying the experience of Switzerland and France, fluoridated salt at a cost of 6 cents per person per year, which reduced to 80% of tooth decay in children. For every dollar spent, saved 250 for future costs of treatment. Would not be difficult to do something similar in Peru.
Oral health has long been a forgotten issue in our country with enormous economic and human suffering for many. There are policies prevention and cure and rehabilitation, which can be implemented without much difficulty. It just takes political will and decision.
Ten Types Of Freshwater Bacteria
, NATURAL RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT
CONTRACTS, NATURAL RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT
One issue that has entered strongly in the electoral debate is the change of operating conditions under which large companies, mainly foreign, to exploit natural resources like gold, copper, oil and gas.
Such a discussion is actually part of a larger discussion: how to develop a country rich in natural resources. One of the characteristics of Peru is just an abundance of these resources. But as our history shows, have many natural resources is no guarantee of development. Moreover, international comparative studies suggest that countries with many natural resources, especially minerals, tend to grow less and no more than those who do not have those resources.
For economists, this is certainly a paradox: how is it possible that those who have more wealth - natural here - not doing better economically? The explanations suggested by those who have studied the issue are that there is private ownership of these resources due to corrupt governments that do not favor the public interest that the efforts of private firms are more oriented to capture the rents that provide these resources to search competitiveness based on technological progress, and that these resources are and prices and unstable market conditions which are then transmitted in severe economic crises in countries.
The recent history of exploitation natural resources in Peru seems to support the first explanation suggested above: the benefits of the exploitation of natural resources are concentrated in very few hands, although it is wealth that belongs to all Peruvians.
In this election campaign have proposed two ways to the changing conditions: the first is to establish new tax rules, such as mining royalties and windfall tax for the current high international prices, the second is renegotiate contracts. Both forms are linked, as the tax stability contracts or legal signed some companies establish limitations on the collection of new taxes. However, This limitation does not extend to all companies, and payment of royalties - as the Constitutional Court has failed - can not be exempted under cover stability contracts (which despite this administration wants to charge them). Advocates
the status quo and want things to remain as they are, they often use the argument that change the situation bother to capitalists and business owners would drive away investment. Indeed, any change is somewhat expensive, and investors like low taxes being charged and get the highest possible profit. The point is that the country is more costly to stay stuck forever in the current situation, allowing our natural resources go or anything to contribute significantly to national development.
On the other hand, the argument that you can not ask for a renegotiation of the contracts because we lose credibility, it is totally hypocritical, since large companies have to raise tens of amendments to contracts and laws in their favor, including some with " name "as the Supreme Decree that has been to favor and allow Doe Run to continue polluting the air and poisoning the children in La Oroya.
Our country needs a better distribution of income, particularly those from natural resources. The state must play a key role in this regard, capturing those resources and allocating them efficiently to improve education, health and social protection and the fight against poverty and the development of the country's poorest areas. As all the candidates say it's time for change, but without this fundamental change, the changes promise to be epidermal. 
CONTRACTS, NATURAL RESOURCES AND DEVELOPMENT
One issue that has entered strongly in the electoral debate is the change of operating conditions under which large companies, mainly foreign, to exploit natural resources like gold, copper, oil and gas.
Such a discussion is actually part of a larger discussion: how to develop a country rich in natural resources. One of the characteristics of Peru is just an abundance of these resources. But as our history shows, have many natural resources is no guarantee of development. Moreover, international comparative studies suggest that countries with many natural resources, especially minerals, tend to grow less and no more than those who do not have those resources.
For economists, this is certainly a paradox: how is it possible that those who have more wealth - natural here - not doing better economically? The explanations suggested by those who have studied the issue are that there is private ownership of these resources due to corrupt governments that do not favor the public interest that the efforts of private firms are more oriented to capture the rents that provide these resources to search competitiveness based on technological progress, and that these resources are and prices and unstable market conditions which are then transmitted in severe economic crises in countries.
The recent history of exploitation natural resources in Peru seems to support the first explanation suggested above: the benefits of the exploitation of natural resources are concentrated in very few hands, although it is wealth that belongs to all Peruvians.
In this election campaign have proposed two ways to the changing conditions: the first is to establish new tax rules, such as mining royalties and windfall tax for the current high international prices, the second is renegotiate contracts. Both forms are linked, as the tax stability contracts or legal signed some companies establish limitations on the collection of new taxes. However, This limitation does not extend to all companies, and payment of royalties - as the Constitutional Court has failed - can not be exempted under cover stability contracts (which despite this administration wants to charge them). Advocates
the status quo and want things to remain as they are, they often use the argument that change the situation bother to capitalists and business owners would drive away investment. Indeed, any change is somewhat expensive, and investors like low taxes being charged and get the highest possible profit. The point is that the country is more costly to stay stuck forever in the current situation, allowing our natural resources go or anything to contribute significantly to national development.
On the other hand, the argument that you can not ask for a renegotiation of the contracts because we lose credibility, it is totally hypocritical, since large companies have to raise tens of amendments to contracts and laws in their favor, including some with " name "as the Supreme Decree that has been to favor and allow Doe Run to continue polluting the air and poisoning the children in La Oroya.
Our country needs a better distribution of income, particularly those from natural resources. The state must play a key role in this regard, capturing those resources and allocating them efficiently to improve education, health and social protection and the fight against poverty and the development of the country's poorest areas. As all the candidates say it's time for change, but without this fundamental change, the changes promise to be epidermal.
Sayings About A Twin Sister
AFPS: COMPREHENSIVE REFORM NEEDED
AND PENSIONS: COMPREHENSIVE REFORM NEEDED
heated discussion this week AFPs on the law of disenrollment. But the argument is misplaced when the issue comes down to a small part of the problem of pensions, and top with a wrong orientation.
The first problem with the current pension system is that 3 out of 4 Peruvians over the age of 65 have no pension of any kind, and that percentage will increase because the percentage of active workers not contributing to a pension system is even greater . AFPs reform failed miserably in ensuring economically aging of Peruvians.
The second problem is that the scheme of two parallel systems (AFPs and ONP) is a bad system. It is said that the National Pension created by Law 19990, which administers the ONP, is broken. But his financial imbalance is due precisely to the installation of the AFPs. The pension system is based on the 19,990 active workers give a part of our salary to support retirees, with the promise that when we are retired, future workers will keep us in the same way. This is called solidarity between generations: young people hold for the elderly. When installed the system of AFPs, a good part of the active workers stopped funding the retired and went to deposit their contributions into an account for the AFPs to invest. It was like taking two or three legs to a table: no way the National Pension System (19990) is in equilibrium, except putting other replacement feet, which makes the state with the budget trasnfiere the ONP. Only that the MEF is always cheap, putting legs are so tiny and pensions are ridiculous.
pension system requires comprehensive reform. Public funds should be directed to create a welfare for the elderly poor, which is perfectly affordable. The contributions of active workers must be divided into two parts: one for a public system that guarantees basic pension to all, another well-regulated AFPs to invest in the country and generate an additional pension for those make greater contributions. 
heated discussion this week AFPs on the law of disenrollment. But the argument is misplaced when the issue comes down to a small part of the problem of pensions, and top with a wrong orientation.
The first problem with the current pension system is that 3 out of 4 Peruvians over the age of 65 have no pension of any kind, and that percentage will increase because the percentage of active workers not contributing to a pension system is even greater . AFPs reform failed miserably in ensuring economically aging of Peruvians.
The second problem is that the scheme of two parallel systems (AFPs and ONP) is a bad system. It is said that the National Pension created by Law 19990, which administers the ONP, is broken. But his financial imbalance is due precisely to the installation of the AFPs. The pension system is based on the 19,990 active workers give a part of our salary to support retirees, with the promise that when we are retired, future workers will keep us in the same way. This is called solidarity between generations: young people hold for the elderly. When installed the system of AFPs, a good part of the active workers stopped funding the retired and went to deposit their contributions into an account for the AFPs to invest. It was like taking two or three legs to a table: no way the National Pension System (19990) is in equilibrium, except putting other replacement feet, which makes the state with the budget trasnfiere the ONP. Only that the MEF is always cheap, putting legs are so tiny and pensions are ridiculous.
pension system requires comprehensive reform. Public funds should be directed to create a welfare for the elderly poor, which is perfectly affordable. The contributions of active workers must be divided into two parts: one for a public system that guarantees basic pension to all, another well-regulated AFPs to invest in the country and generate an additional pension for those make greater contributions.
How Long Can Lorazepam Be Detected In Your Urine?
HEALTH POLICY DEBATE AND PENSIONS
HEALTH POLICY DEBATE begin to present and discuss the plans of government of different parties in health. The main proposals are related, so far, to establish a universal insurance that covers the entire population. To our knowledge, there are at least three issues require attention in the plans of party government.
The first and most obvious is that referred to the proposed financing of the universal. Establish a set of health care must Class available free of charge to the entire population is essential for realizing the right to health. But the main difficulty to be effective assurance that the budget allocated to health, which amounts to little more than 1% of GDP, one of the lowest in Latin America. If funds are not, Where would the resources to pay staff, medicines and supplies required for health care? The parties must commit to increasing funding for public health between 2% and 3% of GDP and use these funds more efficiently and with respect for the rights of users to realize the universal insurance.
A second central issue is the question of the health promotion and disease prevention, ie policies aimed at maintaining good health rather than cure the disease. Child malnutrition is the result of poor diet and the use of contaminated water. Obesity is already a public health problem in Peru, causing various diseases including heart. The snuff, drugs and excessive alcohol consumption are three major causes of illness and death. So are traffic accidents, violence in the streets and into homes. A case of particular importance is the environmental pollution, when we see companies like Doe Run that violate commitments made to poison children Lead, which inevitably affects their mental development. In all these cases, health policy should place emphasis on action on these cases, improving individual behavior and social relations that generate great harm to health. We need healthy economic and social policies. On all these issues, we expect political parties proposals.
The last issue to be strengthened in the government health plans is the question of citizen participation in health. If we do not reform the state to change its relationship with citizens, will remain an inefficient state and crossed by corruption. There are important lessons health, from the class participated in the local to regional level mechanisms such as referendums and caucuses. The next five years should see an important development, for which it is also necessary for candidates to submit proposals and commitments.
The policy debate on proposals for new starts. Hopefully in the next few months we hear more about health alternatives advocated by the various candidates and political forces to properly guide our vote and then to make accountable those elected. AFPS
How Much Does Warrior Boot Camp Cost?
LOURDES: DEFICIT INCREASE NO PROMISES OR BASE?
LOURDES: DEFICIT INCREASE NO PROMISES OR BASE?
In a recent interview he did César Hildebrandt, Lourdes Flores elaborated in detail all the groups to which a new government would help him: herders, fishermen, those tourism businesses, small businesses and large too, education and health, safety, etc. and so forth. César Hildebrandt But when asked if it would charge for more taxes or renegotiate the tax stability contracts with large companies, Lourdes Flores said it was not necessary because there were more than one billion dollars in government accounts that could be used.
The correct figure is much higher: at the end of last year, according to information by the BCR, the Peruvian state has more than 7 billion dollars in bank deposits. But at the same time you have these funds, the state has debts of 30 billion dollars. Not that I on silver. Spending
using public funds deposited in banks and not to increase tax revenues, means increasing the deficit. The deficit is the difference between what the government gets revenue and what it spends, over a period of time. If the government increases spending without having more revenue, the deficit. The result of the deficit is that it increases the difference between debt and government deposits, or should we more or less financial support.
If you spend the billions of dollars to which it referred, Lourdes Flores policy more than double the current fiscal deficit. Is that fiscal policy proposed by Lourdes Flores? In
campaign announced that it is always easy to do many things and not say where the money will be taken to make them. But after several decades, and we learn that unfunded promises never come true. If the proposal is to double the deficit Lourdes, it's better to tell us once and front. Otherwise, know that his many promises can not be fulfilled due to lack of resources. 
LOURDES: DEFICIT INCREASE NO PROMISES OR BASE?
In a recent interview he did César Hildebrandt, Lourdes Flores elaborated in detail all the groups to which a new government would help him: herders, fishermen, those tourism businesses, small businesses and large too, education and health, safety, etc. and so forth. César Hildebrandt But when asked if it would charge for more taxes or renegotiate the tax stability contracts with large companies, Lourdes Flores said it was not necessary because there were more than one billion dollars in government accounts that could be used.
The correct figure is much higher: at the end of last year, according to information by the BCR, the Peruvian state has more than 7 billion dollars in bank deposits. But at the same time you have these funds, the state has debts of 30 billion dollars. Not that I on silver. Spending
using public funds deposited in banks and not to increase tax revenues, means increasing the deficit. The deficit is the difference between what the government gets revenue and what it spends, over a period of time. If the government increases spending without having more revenue, the deficit. The result of the deficit is that it increases the difference between debt and government deposits, or should we more or less financial support.
If you spend the billions of dollars to which it referred, Lourdes Flores policy more than double the current fiscal deficit. Is that fiscal policy proposed by Lourdes Flores? In
campaign announced that it is always easy to do many things and not say where the money will be taken to make them. But after several decades, and we learn that unfunded promises never come true. If the proposal is to double the deficit Lourdes, it's better to tell us once and front. Otherwise, know that his many promises can not be fulfilled due to lack of resources.
Wheelchair And Blow Job
PENSIONS: SEEKING JUSTICE
PENSIONS: SEEKING JUSTICE
The adoption of free resignation of the AFPs by the Congress responds to a real problem: the existence of tens of thousands of affiliates to the AFP received or are receiving a pension retirement tiny. The proposal to allow these people to move into the national pension system, means that the State must assume the cost of providing these people, whom the AFP affiliated with deceptions and broken promises, a better pension.
justice on pensions is a key element of any social policy proposal and any development strategy. The elderly can not be left to their fate by a social order which "forgets" them very easily. The development only if it generates welfare, and in a democracy we must not forget this important segment of the population, considering also that we all aspire to be old someday. The state has a fundamental role to play in this regard.
In this sense, the main problem is that 77% of people over 65 who have no pension, no tiny or great, neither fair nor unfair. None. More than one million people over 65 receive zero pension. Are mostly the poorest peasants, street vendors, market porters, housewives, ie people who generally have not only pension, has no assets with which to stay - a house to rent, savings that give interest -. Dependent and their families, often poor, without autonomy and sometimes even be considered "a burden."
Is it impossible to have a system of pensions for this sector? Among our neighbors, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica and Uruguay provide minimum retirement pension financed by the treasury to those who have no other support in old age. In Bolivia, Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada introduced a system of this type. The Brazilian system has been very successful in reducing poverty among rural households, a system like this that give a minimum pension of 200 soles a month in Peru would cost 70 million soles per month. This equates to 0.3% of GDP, much perfectly fundable if one recalls that the National Agreement established the goal of raising tax revenue by 5% of GDP. The widows of victims of violence could be among the first candidates to enter a scheme of this type, which is very similar to that contained in the Plan proposed by the Reparations Commission of Truth.
Chile's recent presidential campaign took this as one of the most important, and all candidates, including two versions of the right, would need to improve and expand social pensions system, even to offer pensions to all housewives. Hopefully, these concerns go to Peru, and to see the candidates and political organizations with proposals on how to have a pension system fairer for current members of the AFP and the national pension system, especially for those living in poverty at 65, 70 or 80 years without any financial support. 
PENSIONS: SEEKING JUSTICE
The adoption of free resignation of the AFPs by the Congress responds to a real problem: the existence of tens of thousands of affiliates to the AFP received or are receiving a pension retirement tiny. The proposal to allow these people to move into the national pension system, means that the State must assume the cost of providing these people, whom the AFP affiliated with deceptions and broken promises, a better pension.
justice on pensions is a key element of any social policy proposal and any development strategy. The elderly can not be left to their fate by a social order which "forgets" them very easily. The development only if it generates welfare, and in a democracy we must not forget this important segment of the population, considering also that we all aspire to be old someday. The state has a fundamental role to play in this regard.
In this sense, the main problem is that 77% of people over 65 who have no pension, no tiny or great, neither fair nor unfair. None. More than one million people over 65 receive zero pension. Are mostly the poorest peasants, street vendors, market porters, housewives, ie people who generally have not only pension, has no assets with which to stay - a house to rent, savings that give interest -. Dependent and their families, often poor, without autonomy and sometimes even be considered "a burden."
Is it impossible to have a system of pensions for this sector? Among our neighbors, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica and Uruguay provide minimum retirement pension financed by the treasury to those who have no other support in old age. In Bolivia, Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada introduced a system of this type. The Brazilian system has been very successful in reducing poverty among rural households, a system like this that give a minimum pension of 200 soles a month in Peru would cost 70 million soles per month. This equates to 0.3% of GDP, much perfectly fundable if one recalls that the National Agreement established the goal of raising tax revenue by 5% of GDP. The widows of victims of violence could be among the first candidates to enter a scheme of this type, which is very similar to that contained in the Plan proposed by the Reparations Commission of Truth.
Chile's recent presidential campaign took this as one of the most important, and all candidates, including two versions of the right, would need to improve and expand social pensions system, even to offer pensions to all housewives. Hopefully, these concerns go to Peru, and to see the candidates and political organizations with proposals on how to have a pension system fairer for current members of the AFP and the national pension system, especially for those living in poverty at 65, 70 or 80 years without any financial support.
Anniversary Speech For Company By A Trainer
PROBLEMS FOR POOR VOTE
POOR IN TROUBLE VOTE
Poverty is a huge barrier for people to exercise their political rights, starting with the most basic of all: the vote.
the hard way as this barrier is evident in the day of the vote. Many Peruvians have migrated after earning his ID, so you have to return to their place of origin if they want to vote. The cost of tickets and that means time in days by simply making it impossible.
The alternative is anticipated to change the legal address, and therefore the polling place. This also has significant costs, starting with what it charges RENIEC as absurdly to the Peruvian state identity is not a right but a service to be paid.
However, the problems of the vote itself is not the only obstacle for the poor to exercise their political rights. Lack of education and difficult time that the poor can be well aware of the various policy alternatives. Far greater still is the difficulty that they are candidates for or participated in parties, issues that require more time and money.
The difficulty in voting and political participation of the poor is, in turn, a major cause of poverty. Many policies are applied without the poor are taken into account, and many things that could be from the state poverty reduction are not made. A big reason for this is that the poor have little political sense. Therefore favor the poor would vote at the same time, an important tool to fight poverty. 
POOR IN TROUBLE VOTE
Poverty is a huge barrier for people to exercise their political rights, starting with the most basic of all: the vote.
the hard way as this barrier is evident in the day of the vote. Many Peruvians have migrated after earning his ID, so you have to return to their place of origin if they want to vote. The cost of tickets and that means time in days by simply making it impossible.
The alternative is anticipated to change the legal address, and therefore the polling place. This also has significant costs, starting with what it charges RENIEC as absurdly to the Peruvian state identity is not a right but a service to be paid.
However, the problems of the vote itself is not the only obstacle for the poor to exercise their political rights. Lack of education and difficult time that the poor can be well aware of the various policy alternatives. Far greater still is the difficulty that they are candidates for or participated in parties, issues that require more time and money.
The difficulty in voting and political participation of the poor is, in turn, a major cause of poverty. Many policies are applied without the poor are taken into account, and many things that could be from the state poverty reduction are not made. A big reason for this is that the poor have little political sense. Therefore favor the poor would vote at the same time, an important tool to fight poverty.
Probiotics How Long? Candida
TLC: NEGOTIATIONS HAD NOT FINISHED
TLC: NEGOTIATIONS HAD NOT FINISHED
In early December, Alejandro Toledo accompanied CONFIEP leaders and the Minister Alfredo Ferrero, the country announced it had completed the negotiation of "free trade" with United States. The demand for the Peruvian public, how could it be otherwise, was to give to know what had been agreed. If they had completed negotiations and reached an agreement, was the first thing to do.
Then the problems started. The 4-week period was announced for publication of the text of the Treaty was completed and nothing happened. Several weeks later texts were published "preliminary" and incomplete, lacking the agricultural chapter, the most sensitive negotiations. The past weeks have followed, and nothing. After you have been calling and calling, from all sectors of public opinion and through legal action, to be published the text of the agreement, we have learned the basic problem: the negotiation was not over.
Government says they are missing details. But that is precisely what is supposed to have been trading for twenty months and thirteen rounds, at a cost of millions of dollars: the details. A Free Trade Agreement should precisely specify many issues with detail because as the saying goes, "the devil is in the details."
But the truth is they are not insignificant issues. Today we learned that Peru has agreed to plant our authority, which must act to ensure that pests do not spread harmful to agriculture or products that can damage the health of people, it will not be able to act against imports of States together. U.S. Products will not be sold to Peru subject to supervision by national plant, as it does every other country will (do the Americans have a crown?) and as required the U.S. government for Peruvian products. Nor had finished negotiating the possibilities of Peruvian sugar exports to the United States, nor had set the pace at which we dismantle our tariffs against imports of subsidized products from the United States. It is not, then, of minor issues, we can truly call "details." These are important issues for the country, against whom, as to honor its history, the government has lied to the country without any shame.
is not the first lie of the government in the FTA. They said they had preserved our genetic diversity and traditional knowledge, which is totally false: the multinationals may patenting of plants and take advantage of our resources and leave nothing to the country. Said there would be compensation for the public health by the rise of medicines, and so far there is nothing in the budget or any legal measures in this regard.
This government wants to hastily approve a treaty that is not closed and whose content is not yet known. They want the FTA is approved by this Congress of Peru Posible whom neither presidential candidate wants. Surely, many of them might even approve the text of a treaty known. But there is little doubt that would be very bad for our country. 
TLC: NEGOTIATIONS HAD NOT FINISHED
In early December, Alejandro Toledo accompanied CONFIEP leaders and the Minister Alfredo Ferrero, the country announced it had completed the negotiation of "free trade" with United States. The demand for the Peruvian public, how could it be otherwise, was to give to know what had been agreed. If they had completed negotiations and reached an agreement, was the first thing to do.
Then the problems started. The 4-week period was announced for publication of the text of the Treaty was completed and nothing happened. Several weeks later texts were published "preliminary" and incomplete, lacking the agricultural chapter, the most sensitive negotiations. The past weeks have followed, and nothing. After you have been calling and calling, from all sectors of public opinion and through legal action, to be published the text of the agreement, we have learned the basic problem: the negotiation was not over.
Government says they are missing details. But that is precisely what is supposed to have been trading for twenty months and thirteen rounds, at a cost of millions of dollars: the details. A Free Trade Agreement should precisely specify many issues with detail because as the saying goes, "the devil is in the details."
But the truth is they are not insignificant issues. Today we learned that Peru has agreed to plant our authority, which must act to ensure that pests do not spread harmful to agriculture or products that can damage the health of people, it will not be able to act against imports of States together. U.S. Products will not be sold to Peru subject to supervision by national plant, as it does every other country will (do the Americans have a crown?) and as required the U.S. government for Peruvian products. Nor had finished negotiating the possibilities of Peruvian sugar exports to the United States, nor had set the pace at which we dismantle our tariffs against imports of subsidized products from the United States. It is not, then, of minor issues, we can truly call "details." These are important issues for the country, against whom, as to honor its history, the government has lied to the country without any shame.
is not the first lie of the government in the FTA. They said they had preserved our genetic diversity and traditional knowledge, which is totally false: the multinationals may patenting of plants and take advantage of our resources and leave nothing to the country. Said there would be compensation for the public health by the rise of medicines, and so far there is nothing in the budget or any legal measures in this regard.
This government wants to hastily approve a treaty that is not closed and whose content is not yet known. They want the FTA is approved by this Congress of Peru Posible whom neither presidential candidate wants. Surely, many of them might even approve the text of a treaty known. But there is little doubt that would be very bad for our country.
Full Southpark Episode Quicktime
Waterless
Waterless
BRUCE
In the last five years, drinking water coverage in the country has hardly increased. Nationally, one out of every three Peruvians has no potable water connection, similar to 2001. In Lima, more than 600 thousand people are without potable water connection. Responsible: Carlos Bruce, candidate for parliament today.
First from the ministry of the presidency and then from the Ministry of Construction, Carlos Bruce has been responsible Sedapal policy since the beginning of this government. Up recently, the chairman of Sedapal was his own deputy sanitation, Jorge Villacorta, who has resigned to lead the campaign of Bruce.
More than one complaint has been issued in relation to the takeover of key positions in Sedapal by leaders of Peru Posible. The result: Sedapal offered in five-year plan to increase water coverage from 88% to 95%, but has failed to increase or 2% (Data: SUNASS). Half a million Lima residents who planned to drinking water, they were not, thanks to Carlos Bruce. The same plan indicated that Sedapal should reduce unaccounted for water - that is lost on the way or no bill - de 38% a 25%, pero no la han reducido en nada. En el 2003-2004, cuando debía invertir según su plan US$ 820 millones, no invirtió sino US$ 310 millones, mucho menos de la mitad. Así, una mala gestión, dedicada a hacer clientelismo barato con el dinero de los usuarios, ha mantenido a Sedapal sin recursos para invertir impidiendo la ampliación de cobertura. Peor aún, a última hora a los funcionarios designados por Bruce se les ocurre presentar una propuesta para subir las tarifas de agua a más del doble, supuestamente para que en el próximo gobierno se hagan las inversiones cuya mala gestión impidió en 5 años. Claro que la opinión pública los mandó a rodar.
A nivel nacional, Carlos Bruce management has made in the provinces Sanitation Public Enterprises continue downhill, with administrative costs that are double and triple that in other Latin American countries and 43% unaccounted for water. Public investment in sanitation has fallen more than $ 350 million annually, less than 50 million annually. As in Lima, water coverage has increased.
A lack of funding? Before Bruce will be in charge of the ministry of construction, negotiated a loan from the World Bank to provide water and sanitation to rural villages and 50 million dollars. Bruce was able to spend just 3 million.
In short, management politicized and lacking in initiative, which has no investment or concessions allowed, results in a public company discredited as millions of Peruvians are still out of water. This is the application that comes with Rafael Belaunde, the innovator who runs with the flags of the government that criticized a few months ago. What a beautiful family.
Realizing the right to water requires giving priority to the sector have strengthened public companies with good technical and business management to make fair deals to attract private investment in rural areas and a strong investment goes hand in hand with organizing and train communities in water management. And do not forget those who failed a fundamental responsibility to the poor, as Charles Bruce. 
Waterless
BRUCE
In the last five years, drinking water coverage in the country has hardly increased. Nationally, one out of every three Peruvians has no potable water connection, similar to 2001. In Lima, more than 600 thousand people are without potable water connection. Responsible: Carlos Bruce, candidate for parliament today.
First from the ministry of the presidency and then from the Ministry of Construction, Carlos Bruce has been responsible Sedapal policy since the beginning of this government. Up recently, the chairman of Sedapal was his own deputy sanitation, Jorge Villacorta, who has resigned to lead the campaign of Bruce.
More than one complaint has been issued in relation to the takeover of key positions in Sedapal by leaders of Peru Posible. The result: Sedapal offered in five-year plan to increase water coverage from 88% to 95%, but has failed to increase or 2% (Data: SUNASS). Half a million Lima residents who planned to drinking water, they were not, thanks to Carlos Bruce. The same plan indicated that Sedapal should reduce unaccounted for water - that is lost on the way or no bill - de 38% a 25%, pero no la han reducido en nada. En el 2003-2004, cuando debía invertir según su plan US$ 820 millones, no invirtió sino US$ 310 millones, mucho menos de la mitad. Así, una mala gestión, dedicada a hacer clientelismo barato con el dinero de los usuarios, ha mantenido a Sedapal sin recursos para invertir impidiendo la ampliación de cobertura. Peor aún, a última hora a los funcionarios designados por Bruce se les ocurre presentar una propuesta para subir las tarifas de agua a más del doble, supuestamente para que en el próximo gobierno se hagan las inversiones cuya mala gestión impidió en 5 años. Claro que la opinión pública los mandó a rodar.
A nivel nacional, Carlos Bruce management has made in the provinces Sanitation Public Enterprises continue downhill, with administrative costs that are double and triple that in other Latin American countries and 43% unaccounted for water. Public investment in sanitation has fallen more than $ 350 million annually, less than 50 million annually. As in Lima, water coverage has increased.
A lack of funding? Before Bruce will be in charge of the ministry of construction, negotiated a loan from the World Bank to provide water and sanitation to rural villages and 50 million dollars. Bruce was able to spend just 3 million.
In short, management politicized and lacking in initiative, which has no investment or concessions allowed, results in a public company discredited as millions of Peruvians are still out of water. This is the application that comes with Rafael Belaunde, the innovator who runs with the flags of the government that criticized a few months ago. What a beautiful family.
Realizing the right to water requires giving priority to the sector have strengthened public companies with good technical and business management to make fair deals to attract private investment in rural areas and a strong investment goes hand in hand with organizing and train communities in water management. And do not forget those who failed a fundamental responsibility to the poor, as Charles Bruce.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)